Let’s Not Dismiss the MBA So Soon

In yesterday’s Financial Times, Stefan Stern wrote an interesting piece titled Why MBA Bashing is Unfair. In it he argues that, while graduate business programs aren’t perfect and need to evolve, they are not churning out the sharp-elbowed, non-consequence-caring sharks that some in the media have accused them of producing. If anything, they are guilty of producing leaders who only manage by the numbers, and, because of their lack of true management experience, are unable to step back at times and think about an organization as a whole.

To be sure, the stereotype of the cocky MBA is somewhat deserved. Heck, recently one of Harvard’s own MBAs put out a book describing HBS as the “cauldron of capitalism” in his own unflattering words. But to say that “arrogance and greed” are solely responsible for our current economic troubles misses the larger point about the value that an MBA can provide.

Argues Stern:

The content of the course, while not exactly incidental, is really not the most important thing. It is the process itself: applying for a place, being admitted, meeting and working with faculty and contemporaries, and forming a new network, that matters.

This is what you find when you talk to sceptical MBA graduates who may not remember a great deal about the different modules they studied. Even they will describe their time at business school as a transformative experience. They went in one end as a fairly ordinary, apprentice businessperson. They came out the other ready to operate at a higher level.

This is what we at Veritas Prep always tell our admissions consulting and GMAT prep clients: The hardest part of business school may seem to be getting in, but once you’re in, what value you get out of the program is entirely up to you. There’s at least as much value in the chance to make new friends, get exposed to new viewpoints, and build an incredible new network, as there is in learning about the capital asset pricing model.

And, as McGill University professor Henry Mintzberg argues in the FT article, the real learning about how to manage still needs to occur on the job, after you graduate. That inevitably means that at some point a fresh MBA will be promoted into a role that he’s not yet fulled qualified for, but management must be learned in context. Today’s business leaders are at least as responsible for educating tomorrow’s leaders as any MBA program is. This has always been the case, and will continue to be true well after the current economic mess passes.


One response to “Let’s Not Dismiss the MBA So Soon

  1. I think another relevant point in this mini ‘who’s to blame’ debate is the fact that on-the-job learning is usually (anecdotal-ly, at least) more important than course curriculum: how often have you spoken to a recent grad who says “since I started working I haven’t used a thing I learned at uni”? Fellow FT contributor Philip Delves Broughton kicked this debate off with his ‘masters of the apocalypse’ piece, and he unequivocally attributes blame to MBAs and B-schools…to be fair though, and strictly objective, how can anyone say with certainty that all this unethical practices weren’t built-into, taught, and learned on-the-job on Wall Street? Surely the corporate culture of the financial services and consulting industries plays a big part in this…?

    R. Vaughn

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s